Public and Administrative

Judicial Review

Landmark’s barristers have extensive experience of judicial review (and statutory challenges) across the whole range of its public, planning and environmental law fields of expertise.

Overview

Landmark’s public law team is highly ranked across its areas of specialisms in the directories and it has a significant number of top ranked individuals. Its members regularly appear in public law cases at all levels, from groundbreaking cases in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, to statutory appeals in the tribunals.

Landmark's barristers regularly appear in Judicial Reviews (in the Administrative Court and Upper Tribunal) the range and depth of expertise means that Landmark can offer excellent advice and representation for claimants and defendants alike, no matter what the scale or complexity of the case.

Landmark’s barristers regularly appear for NGOs, campaigning groups, commercial organisations, environmental and other charities and individuals in their challenges to government decisions and for the full range of defendants – representing the full range of government departments (with many of its members on the Government’s Panels), regulators, local authorities and health bodies.

Landmark’s public law experience spans a broad range of areas: not just Landmark’s traditional core of environmental, planning and local government judicial reviews (in which it has always had an unparalleled reputation), but other areas such as regulatory, healthcare, civil liberties, social welfare, social security, national security, immigration and education challenges. Please see the other pages for more details.

Landmark's Miranda Butler, Alex Shattock and Charles Bishop contributed to the Public Law Project’s (PLP) Public Interest Interventions guide, which offers crucial support to NGOs, charities, and lawyers navigating the process of intervening in judicial review claims and other court proceedings.