Alex Shattock

Environment

Alex practices in all aspects of environmental law and has been ranked for several years in this area in the legal directories. He is particularly interested in pollution, climate change and the overlap between equality law and planning.

His clients include NGOs and campaigners such as Animal Equality, Campaign for National Parks, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, ClientEarth, Compassion in World Farming, the Environmental Law Foundation, Extinction Rebellion activists, Fossil Free London, the Good Law Project, Friends of the Earth, Oceana, Rights: Community: Action, the RSPB, Transport Action Network, the Wildlife Trusts, Wild Justice, WWF-UK, and several squirrel rescue charities.

Notable instructions include:

• Wild Justice v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (2025). Acting for the claimant in a challenge to the ministerial statement pursuant to s.20 of the Environment Act 2021 in respect of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill.
  
• Rights: Community: Action v DLUHC [2025] EWCA Civ 990 acting for the Claimant in the Court of Appeal in the first reported case concerning the application of s.19 of the Environment Act 2021. Led by Alex Goodman KC.
  
• R (Boswell) v Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero [2025] EWCA Civ 669: environmental challenge to the Net Zero Teeside DCO. Led by Catherine Dobson.
  
• Friends of the Earth v DLUHC [2025] Env. L.R. 14. Instructed by Friends of the Earth to challenge the grant of permission to a new deep coal mine in Cumbria. Alex also acted for Friends of the Earth in the four-week planning inquiry. Led by Paul Brown KC. Reported on the BBC.
• Rights: Community: Action v DLUHC [2024] EWHC 1693 (Admin): acting for the Claimant in the first reported case concerning the application of s.19 of the Environment Act 2021. Led by Alex Goodman KC.
• Rights: Community: Action v DLUHC [2024] EWHC 359 (Admin): Acting for the claimant in a challenge to the main modifications recommended by two Inspectors examining the area action plan for a new garden village. The main modifications would significantly water down the net zero/low carbon elements of the plan. Led by Alex Goodman KC.
• Acting unled in a complaint brought by ClientEarth against DEFRA to the Office for Environmental Protection regarding the repeated reauthorisation of the neonicotinoid pesticide ‘Cruiser SB’. Reported in the Guardian.
• Acting unled in a complaint brought by WWF-UK and ClientEarth against DEFRA and the Environment Agency to the Office for Environmental Protection, regarding endemic agricultural pollution and under-enforcement.
• Protect Dunsfold v DLUHC: a climate change challenge to the grant of planning permission for an exploratory oil and gas well. Led by Estelle Dehon KC. Reported on the BBC.
• R (Cox and others) v Oil and Gas Authority: Instructed by Extinction Rebellion activists in a judicial review of the Oil and Gas Authority’s approach to the statutory definition of maximising economic revenue. Led by David Wolfe KC with Merrow Golden.

Public and Administrative

Alex has a broad public law practice and is regularly instructed in judicial review matters. He is ranked in Chambers and Partners for public and administrative law. He is often on the claimant side, but has also acted for Defendant local authorities, universities and educational institutions.

Recently he has been instructed in public law cases involving actions against the police, elections, information rights, community care, education issues, age assessments and the lawfulness of public authority actions. He has a particular expertise in urgent applications for interim relief and has been involved in many cases on behalf of vulnerable individuals.

Recent cases include:

• R. (on the application Zenunllari) v Lambeth LBC [2025] EWHC 1969 (Admin). JR challenging the lawfulness of a local authority setting up a corporate entity to lease housing on a short-term basis. Unled, reported in the Guardian.
  
• Amin v Information Commissioner [2025] UKFTT 952 (GRC): successful information rights claim concerning lobbying to water down net zero policies. Led by Alex Goodman KC.
  
• Wild Justice v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (2025). Acting for the claimant in a challenge to the ministerial statement pursuant to s.20 of the Environment Act 2021. A case concerning issues of parliamentary privilege and Article 9 of the Bill of Rights. Led by Alex Goodman KC.
  
• MSK v East Sussex CC (2025, Upper Tribunal). Successful age assessment challenge for a young asylum seeker, unled.
  
• Vargova v SSHD (2025, Court of Appeal). Intervening for the AIRE Centre in a case about the application of the EU proportionality principle post-Brexit. Led by Tim Buley KC.
• Abdullah and others v SSHD [2024] UKUT 00066 (IAC). Intervening for the AIRE Centre in a case about the interaction between Article 8 and the Withdrawal Agreement. Led by Tim Buley KC.
• R (MQ) v SSHD [2023] EWHC 205 (Admin). Acting for the claimant asylum seeker in a systemic challenge to the Home Office’s allocation system for asylum accommodation, based on Article 8 and s.55 of the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009. Led by Zoe Leventhal KC.
• SK v SSHD: unled successful Article 8 deportation appeal in the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal.
• Osman v DWP: Acting for a blind man in a judicial review of DWP’s failure to provide accessible communications. Challenge brought under the Equality Act and Article 14. Led by Tim Buley KC.
• XXX v Camden Borough Council [2020] EWCA Civ 1468, acting for the claimant in the leading Court of Appeal case on applications for anonymity orders under CPR 39.2. Led by Justin Bates KC.
• Unled in various complex challenges to care packages and healthcare support on behalf of disabled individuals and children, often with multiple Defendants and KCs instructed on the other side.

Education

Alex has a strong education law practice and been instructed on a variety of education matters. He advises individuals, schools, local authorities and the DfE. He is regularly instructed in SEN appeals and discrimination challenges in the First-tier Tribunal, involving issues such as whether an EHC plan should be made, choice of placement, overprovision, unreasonable public expenditure, and whether non-NHS approved treatments can be included in an EHC plan.

He often advises schools and local authorities on discrimination and equality issues.

He was instructed by Ofsted in a significant judicial review of a report brought by the educational establishment in question.

Human Rights and Civil Liberties

Alex has a keen interest in human rights, civil liberties and Equality Act issues. A lot of his work in this area is done on Legal Aid.

Notable work includes:

• Sole counsel for the claimant in numerous urgent claimant reviews of the Home Office’s failure to provide adequate accommodation to vulnerable destitute asylum seekers and failed asylum seekers. His clients in this area have included a large number of disabled and/or stateless asylum seekers with infant children. See eg TG v SSHD [2021] 1 WLUK 253 and K v SSHD [2020] EWHC 3639 (Admin).

• Leadbetter v Secretary of State: Acting for the claimant in an equality challenge on behalf of a blind lady to the provision of inaccessible COVID-19 shielding information. Settled with all the claimant’s costs paid, after the government agreed to reconsider its approach and pay for detailed research into accessible shielding communications. Led by Tim Buley KC. Reported on the BBC.

• Instructed for the claimant in an urgent Article 3 challenge to a Council’s decision to remove a homeless man on daily dialysis from a hospital without an adequate accommodation and transport package in place.

• Instructed for the claimant in an urgent High Court challenge to a local authority and CCG’s failure to carry out an assessment under s.117 of the Mental Health Act.

• DMA v SSHD [2020] EWHC 3416 (Admin) (interim hearing only): A successful High Court disclosure application to require the Secretary of State to release sensitive KPI data relating to its private accommodation providers for failed asylum seekers. The disclosed information was relied on heavily by the judge in the final hearing.

• Instructed for the claimant with Justin Bates in an Equality Act challenge to a local council’s social housing allocation scheme.

• Claimant judicial review of a trafficking ‘reasonable grounds’ decision

• Instructed in a claim against the Information Commissioner concerning information rights, anonymity orders, reasonable adjustments and freedom of expression. Led by Samantha Broadfoot KC and Julia Smyth.

• Numerous unlawful detention/false imprisonment judicial reviews and damages claims.

Immigration

Alex regularly appears in immigration and asylum hearings, in the First-tier Tribunal, Upper Tribunal and High Court. He has appeared in the Upper Tribunal in several deportation cases and has a particular expertise in cases involving the EEA Regulations.

He also regularly advises on unlawful detention and false imprisonment cases, including merits and quantum issues.

International

Alex has an in-depth knowledge of international law. During his PhD he taught students on the undergraduate international law module. His doctoral research considered issues such as terrorism, military intervention, self-determination, neutrality and the UN Charter. He has presented his research at several academic conferences and at the UK Law Commission. His research on civil wars was cited in Professor Gray’s International Law and the Use of Force (4^th ed), the leading academic textbook on military intervention.

Alex has been instructed on cases involving international human rights obligations, the extra-territoriality of UK discrimination legislation and the UNHCR. He acted for the defendant in a challenge to a UK resettlement scheme for refugees fleeing Syria, in which the claimant argued too many Muslim were being admitted onto the scheme in breach of equality law and public international law (Led by David Blundell KC).

He has also provided advice on a variety of public international law matters, including:

• Advising on the application of international treaty law in the context of Brexit

• Advising on the scope of certain international immunities

• The UK treaty ratification process

• Issues relating to the Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territories.

Planning

Alex accepts planning instructions from individuals, community groups, local authorities and property developers, and regularly advises on a range of planning issues. He is often instructed as sole counsel against leading planning KCs in inquiries and judicial review/statutory review claims. He is ranked in the Legal 500 for planning law and has previously been ranked as one of Planning Magazine’s top-rated junior barristers under 35.

Notable cases include:

• Guardians of Whitewebbs CIC v LB Enfield (2025)- Leading Claudia Hyde in a challenge brought by local residents to the redevelopment of a local park by Tottenham Hotspur football club.
  
• R (Dennis) v LB Southwark [2024] EWHC (Admin)- instructed for the claimant in a case concerning overlapping planning permissions and estate regeneration. Initially unled, and led by Jenny Wigley KC following the grant of permission.
• Land at Gomm Valley, High Wycombe. Acting for a housing developer at a 17-day inquiry concerning landscape, design, ecology and transport. Led by James Maurici KC.
  
• Land off Lodge Road, Hurst. Sole counsel for the Rule 6 Party in a two-week inquiry concerning sustainability, transport, housing land supply and biodiversity issues.
• The Goose House, Pyebush Lane, Buckinghamshire. Sole counsel for the local planning authority in a two-week enforcement inquiry. Alex successfully argued that the construction of a dwelling was not caught by the 4-year rule as it was part and parcel of the change of use. Inexplicably overturned in the Court of Appeal.
• Land east of Bredon Road and Tewkesbury Road, Mitton. Acting for the developer in a two-week inquiry concerning AONB and transport issues. Led by Neil Cameron KC.
• Acting for the claimant in R (Rights: Community: Action) v SSHCLG [2021] EWCA Civ 1954, an environmental and equalities challenge to the government’s “slum housing” permitted development reforms and Class E planning deregulation (Alex appeared in both the Court of Appeal and Divisional Court), reported in the media here, here and here. Led by Paul Brown KC. During the course of the claim, the government announced minimum space standards for permitted development homes in England.
• R (CARA) v North Dorset District Council [2021] EWHC 646 (Admin): successful late judicial review of a planning permission for a large caravan site in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (brought 6.5 years out of time). Led by Richard Turney KC.
• Haytop Country Park: Sole counsel for a Rule 6 Party in a seven-day planning inquiry in which the developer had expanded a caravan site after unlawfully felling 100+ protected trees. Cross-examination on landscape, heritage, arboriculture, and planning. Opening submissions quoted in local media.

Alex’s briefing note on the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill, written with Paul Brown KC, has been widely circulated and attracted a signed written response from the Secretary of State.

A lot of Alex’s planning work has an environmental element and can be seen under the environmental expertise tab.

Cross-practice

Landmark's barristers often work at the intersection of our core practice areas; bringing a wide range of skills, knowledge and experience to bear on a particular dispute or issue facing a client.

Our focus is always on achieving the best possible outcome for our client. By viewing the client's objectives in a holistic way - and not purely through the lens of one rigidly-defined legal area - we deliver the best possible advice and representation in complex matters that engage multiple specialist areas of law. 

Whether it's providing support as an individual cross-practice barrister or a cross-disciplinary team of Landmark counsel, we are able to draw on an outstanding array of complementary skillsets and knowledge bases. This often achieves a better result than instructing multiple barristers from different specialist sets. This also improves the quality of client care through increased levels of communication, quicker response times, and a coordinated approach to clerking and fees, made possible by our team-based cross-practice approach.

Please contact our practice management team for more information.

Public Interest Litigation

Alex chairs the Public Interest Litigation Group within chambers. Much of his work has a public interest element and involves legal challenges brought to further his clients’ wider campaigning objectives, as can be seen under the other tabs.

He accepts Legal Aid instructions and pro bono instructions in appropriate cases.

EU Law post-Brexit