State Aid and Procurement
- Community Infrastructure Levy
- Compulsory Purchase and Compensation
- Criminal Planning Matters
- Development Contracts and Overage
- Development Plans and other planning policy
- Energy
- Environmental Impact Assessment
- Flooding and Drainage
- Fracking
- Highways, Footpaths and Rights of Way
- Infrastructure
- Landscape, Agriculture and Countryside
- Marine Planning and Harbour Orders
- Neighbourhood Planning
- Parliamentary Bills
- Planning Advice
- Planning Appeals, Inquiries and Hearings
- Planning Enforcement
- Planning Injunctions
- Planning Judicial and Statutory Reviews
- Section 106 Agreements and Enforcement
- Strategic Environmental Assessment
- State Aid and Procurement
- Transport Orders
- Village Greens, Commons and Manorial Rights
- Wildlife and Habitats
- Attorney General’s Panel of Counsel
Landmark’s public procurement team offers expertise in all areas of public procurement, with barristers regularly instructed to advise on procurement related issues in particular in the urban development, housing, healthcare, transport, waste, energy and utilities sectors.
Our team advises economic operators, contracting authorities and third parties on all stages of procurement competitions, including non-contentious advice on the design of tenders and ITTs, the conduct of competitions and litigation arising out of challenges to contract award decisions, through to post-award contract variations and assignment. We have acted in many of the most significant procurement cases in recent years in the UK courts including:
- Wylde v Waverley Borough Council [2017] J.P.L. 861 – on the test for standing to bring a judicial review claim alleging a breach of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015;
- R (Faraday) v West Berkshire Council (2016) 168 Con. L.R. 831 – on whether a conditional obligation to perform works in a development agreement is sufficient to be a “direct or indirect obligation” so as to bring the agreement within the scope of Directive 2014/24/EU and the Public Contracts Regulations 2015;
- R (Gottlieb) v Winchester City Council [2015] EWHC 231 (Admin) – on the principles applicable to whether variations to an existing public works contract require procurement;
- R (Leyton Orient Football Club) v London Legacy Development Corporation [2013] EWHC 3653 (Admin) – the procurement challenge to the London Legacy Development Corporation’s rejection of a bid from Leyton Orient for the use of the London 2012 Olympic Stadium;
- Covanta v Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority (2013) 151 Con. L.R. 146 – on interim relief in procurement challenges;
- R (All About Rights Law Practice) v Lord Chancellor [2013] EWHC 3461 – on the principle of equal treatment of bidders;
- R (Hossacks) v Legal Services Commission [2012] EWCA Civ 1203 – on public authorities’ powers to seek clarification or amendment of a tender and the principle of equal treatment in the context of the contracting authority’s approach to mistakes in bids;
- R (Midlands Co-Operative Society Ltd.) v Birmingham City Council [2012] B.L.G.R. 393 – on the applicability of the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 to development agreements;
- JR Jones v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 3671 (Ch) – on improvements in bids and the circumstances in which a mistake can be corrected.
Specific areas of expertise include:
- NHS procurement and commissioning (pharmaceuticals, clinical and other services);
- Central government contracting, including loan schemes initiatives and the MoJ’s implementation of legal aid reform;
- Construction projects for national infrastructure projects;
- Development agreements for urban regeneration, including local authority estate regeneration programmes;
- Transport projects;
- PFI/PPP contracts and project financing;
- Electricity Market Reform and the Contracts for Difference auctions;
- Renewable energy solar schemes;
- Local authority contracts, including waste and renewable energy schemes.