Planning & Compulsory Purchase

Matthew has been consistently ranked among the top barristers in planning law under the age of 35 in the Planning Magazine’s 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 Legal Surveys (ranked joint 5th in the most recent survey). In 2021, he was also ranked for the first time among the top planning juniors of all ages. His advocacy and advisory practice extends to all areas of planning and compulsory purchase law.

In Legal 500 for 2022 he is ranked as a “Leading Junior” in Planning Law: “Trusted support to senior QCs on high profile and significant matters. Having Matthew on board gives the client confidence that the work will be done thoroughly and promptly.”

Recent planning court cases include:

• Patel v SSHCLG  [2021] EWHC 2115 (Admin) – Interpretation of a planning condition concerning noise impacts;

• Hedges v SSHCLG [2021] EWHC 2392 (Admin) – Challenge under section 289 to an Inspector’s decision to dismiss an appeal against an enforcement notice;

• Monkhill Ltd v SSHCLG  [2021] EWCA Civ 74 – Meaning of policies providing a “clear reason for refusal” in National Planning Policy Framework para. 11(d);

• R (Finch) v Surrey CC [2020] EWHC 3566 (Admin) – Scope of requirement to carry out environmental impact assessment in relation to greenhouse gas emissions (appeal to Court of Appeal pending);

• Peel Investments (North) Ltd v SSHCLG [2021] PTSR 298 – Whether a time-expired plan is “out of date” under para. 11(d) of the National Planning Policy Framework;

• Rectory Homes v SSHCLG [2020] EWHC 2098 (Admin) – s.288 challenge to Inspector’s decision concerning approach to C2 and C3 use classes and the meaning of “housing” in local policy.

• Aireborough Neighbourhood Development Forum v Leeds City Council [2020] 1 W.L.R. 2355; [2020] 1461 (Admin); [2020] EWHC 2183 (Admin) – Challenge to the Leeds Site Allocations Plan (three judgments dealing with: legal capacity to bring proceedings; the substantive claim; relief).

• Keep Bourne End Green v Wycombe Council [2020] EWHC 1984 (Admin) – s.113 challenge to Wycombe Local Plan (represented successful council at permission stage).

• Advearse v Dorset Council [2020] EWHC 807 (Admin) – judicial review of decision to grant planning permission for major development in the Dorset AONB (acted for successful council).

• Craven District Council v SSHCLG (CO/58/2020) – s.288 challenge to an Inspector’s decision to grant planning permission for housing development (permission refused at oral renewal hearing; acted for successful IP).

• Tower Hamlets LBC v SSHCLG  [2020] P.T.S.R. 111 – Interpretation of National Planning Policy Framework para. 196 on harm to heritage assets.

• Xyan Holdings v SSHCLG [2019] EWHC 2907 (Admin) – s.288 challenge raising issues of interpretation of affordable housing policy in the London Plan and local plan.

• R (Locke) v Newcastle City Council (CO/4426/2019) – permission refused in judicial review of a grant of planning permission for 1,200 homes in Newcastle Great Park.

• HJ Banks & Company Ltd v SSHCLG  [2019] P.T.S.R. 668 – a challenge to the decision to refuse planning permission for a new open-cast coal mine (acting for Friends of the Earth).

• R (Gorst Energy) v East Devon District Council (CO/4635/2019) – challenge to a Breach of Condition Notice.

• Dover DC & China Gateway International Ltd v CPRE Kent  [2018] 1 W.L.R. 108 – Leading case in the Supreme Court concerning the duty on local authorities to give reasons for planning decisions.

• William Davis Ltd v Charnwood BC  [2018] J.P.L. 549 – acted for five major housebuilders in a successful challenge concerning the lawfulness of a Supplementary Planning Document housing mix policy.

• Eatherley v Camden LBC  [2017] P.T.S.R. 288 – key case defining the scope of permitted development rights for basements (acted for the successful claimant).

• Basildon Council v Whiting  (HQ18X03326) – successful multi-hearing proceedings in High Court seeking an injunction to restrain unauthorised development.

Recent planning inquiries and hearings include:

• Skippy Industries Ltd environmental permit revocation appeal – representing the Environment Agency – January 2022

• Knipton and Eshton Beck water abstraction licence condition appeals – representing the Environment Agency – January 2022

• Land West of Loxwood Road, Alfold – representing the successful appellants securing planning permission for 99 homes in Surrey countryside – December 2021

• Land at Cornwall Road, Basildon – representing local authority successfully resisting an enforcement notice appeal – October 2021

• Site Allocations DPD Examination, Cheshire East – representing Cheshire East Council in the examination hearings for their new Site Allocations DPD – October 2021

• Old Army Camp, Chichester – Representing Chichester District Council in resisting an appeal against an enforcement notice – September 2021

• Land East of Broad Road, Hambrook – Representing developer promoting a scheme for 118 homes at a public inquiry – September 2021

• Whitstable Oyster Company, Whitstable – Representing the oyster company in appealing against an enforcement notice requiring the removal of intertidal trestles used for cultivation of oysters – July/August 2021

• Madonna Halley Hotel, Edgware – Representing hotel owner in appeal against enforcement notice concerning basement development – July 2021

• Bullens Green Lane, Colney Heath – 2 week public inquiry acting jointly for Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council and St Albans City and District Council in relation to a scheme for 100 homes in the Green Belt – April – May 2021

• Newbridge Road, Bath – 2 week public inquiry acting for appellant Oakhill Group Limited in relation to a major residential and student accommodation scheme – February 2021

• Oyster Trestles, Whitstable – 3-week public inquiry acting for Whitstable Oyster Company appealing an Enforcement Notice seeking removal of oyster trestles on Whitstable foreshore – March – April 2020

• Land East of Loxwood Road, Alfold – 4-day inquiry concerning a housing scheme in the countryside of Waverley – January 2020

• Missanda, Wells Lane, Ascot – 1 day hearing concerning an appeal against refusal to discharge planning conditions for housing scheme – January 2020

• Holly House, Harpsden – 8 day inquiry concerning a property in the Chilterns AONB – April, September & December 2019

• Swanley Town Centre Regeneration, Swanley – 4 day inquiry acting for the successful appellant seeking permission for mixed-use regeneration – June 2019

• Waterside Holiday Park, Essex – 3 day inquiry acting for the successful local planning authority resisting an LDC appeal relating to a caravan park – March 2019

• Land south of Gloucester Road, Thornbury – 4 week inquiry for Rule 6 party (Tortworth Estate / St Modwen) opposing 370-home scheme – January to March 2019

• Former Kumor Nursery, Dover – three day inquiry for LPA successfully resisting appeal concerning 60-home scheme – December 2018

• Whitecap Mushroom Farm, Mayland – two day inquiry for a Lawful Development Certificate appeal, acting for Maldon DC – November 2018

• Land East of Park Road, Didcot – four-day inquiry concerning 135 homes in South Oxfordshire, acting for the developer – May 2018

• Racton View, Chichester – one day enforcement inquiry acting for Chichester District Council concerning a chicken farm – May 2018

• Earl Road, Handforth – five-week inquiry acting for a retail developer in a called-in application in Handforth Dean, Cheshire East – January to April 2018

• Worsley Greenway, Salford – four-week inquiry acting for Manchester City Council resisting a 600-dwelling (plus marina, retail and café) appeal – February to March 2018

• South Eden Park Road, Bromley – four-day circa-100 home inquiry, acting for Bromley Council – January 2018

• Flatts Lane, Redcar – acted for a housebuilder in a successful appeal concerning a 400-home scheme – April 2017

• King v Maldon DC – acted for the council in successfully resisting an enforcement appeal raising issues of deliberate concealment – March 2017

• Gorstyhill “Wychwood Village Extension”, Crewe – acted for Cheshire East Council successfully resisting a recovered appeal concerning a 900-home scheme – February 2017

• Fontwell Avenue, Fontwell – acted for the successful developer in an inquiry concerning a called-in application for a 400-home residential and employment scheme in West Sussex, raising issues of conflict with made and emerging neighbourhood plans – November 2016

• Cheshire East Local Plan examination hearings – acting for Cheshire East Council – September to October 2016

• Olney Rugby Club footpath inquiry – successfully represented a rugby club in a public inquiry to determine the existence of a right of way over the club’s land – May 2016

• Ahmed v Brent Council – acted for successful appellant in an enforcement inquiry concerning issues of deliberate concealment – November 2015

Current / recent compulsory purchase work:

• References in the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) relating to compensation payable for the acquisition of the Euston Estates for HS2 – acting for the Secretary of State for Transport in a major compensation dispute arising from to the compulsory purchase of land around Euston Station for the purposes of constructing HS2 and station redevelopment.

• Land at the former Redcar Steel Works, Redcar – 3-week public inquiry concerning the South Tees Development Corporation’s CPO for major industrial regeneration scheme – February 2020.

Matthew regularly advises developers, local government, community groups and individuals about a wide range of planning and compulsory purchase issues. In addition to his civil practice, he has regular experience prosecuting and defending in criminal planning enforcement proceedings, as well as acting in appeals against other statutory notices, in the Magistrates’ Court and the Crown Court.

Matthew is a Contributing Editor to the Encyclopedia of Planning Law and Practice, and a member of the Planning and Environmental Bar Association and the UK Environmental Lawyers’ Association.

Environment

Matthew is an experienced environmental lawyer. Much of his planning work engages environmental issues including climate change, air quality, ecology and biodiversity, waste and landfill, land contamination, and arboriculture.

Recent work includes:

• R (Finch) v Surrey CC [2020] EWHC 3566 (Admin) – Scope of requirement to carry out environmental impact assessment in relation to greenhouse gas emissions (appeal to Court of Appeal pending);

• HJ Banks & Company Ltd v SSHCLG [2019] P.T.S.R. 668 – a challenge to the decision to refuse planning permission for a new open-cast coal mine (acting for Friends of the Earth).

• Dillner v Sheffield City Council [2016] Env. L.R. 31 – acted for the successful interested party resisting a judicial review concerning the lawfulness of tree-felling highway maintenance operations.

• Jim 2 Ltd v Walsall MBC – acted for the council in a two-week public inquiry to determine a contaminated land appeal under Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (the second ever inquiry in the history of the regime).

• Advising a leading climate change campaign group in respect of Brexit legislation relating to the environment.

• Advising landfill operators concerning the Environment Agency’s regulatory charging regime.

He is a member of the UK Environmental Lawyers Association.

Public

Matthew has a broad practice across a range of areas within public law. He is regularly instructed by local authorities, central government departments, private individuals and companies, local groups, NGOs and charities. He is a member of the Attorney General’s C Panel of Counsel.

While much of his work relates to planning and environmental law as sub-categories of public law, his practice also extends to a wide array of public law fields including immigration, social security, healthcare, human rights, protest and civil liberties.

Current / recent work for Central Government departments include litigation and advisory matters for the Department for Work and Pensions, the Home Office, HMRC, the Ministry of Defence, and the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities.

In Chambers & Partners for 2022 he is ranked as “Up and Coming” in Administrative & Public Law: “He’s very measured and effective.” “A very responsive, helpful and diligent barrister who is always on top of his brief.” “Very personable and committed.”

Recent work includes:

• Kaitey v SSHD [2021] EWCA Civ 1875 – whether conditional immigration bail can be imposed on a person if it would be unlawful to detain them.

• R (Balhav Singh) v SSHD (JR/5767/2019) – Acted for the Secretary of State in a case about the duty to remedy an historical injustice in immigration decisions.

• R (Tumani) v Transport for London (CO/2610/2020) – Acted for claimant in a challenge to a decision to re-route a bus.

• RR v SSWP  [2019] 1 W.L.R. 6430 – Major constitutional case in the Supreme Court about what remedy a tribunal can grant to victims of the bedroom tax – acted for the successful appellant.

• KT and SH v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2020] UKUT 252 (AAC) – How to approach in PIP decisions the risk of fire to deaf people while they wash.

• Dover DC & China Gateway International Ltd v CPRE Kent  [2018] 1 W.L.R. 108 – Leading case in the Supreme Court concerning the duty on local authorities to give reasons for planning decisions.

• Aireborough Neighbourhood Development Forum v Leeds City Council [2020] 1 W.L.R. 2355 – Whether unincorporated associations have legal capacity to issue proceedings.

• HJ Banks & Company Ltd v SSHCLG  [2019] P.T.S.R. 668 – a challenge to the decision to refuse planning permission for a new open-cast coal mine (acting for Friends of the Earth).

• RJ, GMcL and CS v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v RJ (PIP)  [2017] UKUT 105 (AAC) –  three-judge panel of the Upper Tribunal in a case concerning the interpretation of the meaning of “safely” in the Personal Independence Payment Regulations 2013 (acting pro bono for the National Deaf Children’s Society).

• Antoniades (No.2) & Others v The Administrator of the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia – Acting for the Administrator in the Sovereign Base Areas in Cyprus, defending a long-running judicial review brought by several hundred local employees concerning civil service pay reductions.

• Bufalo v SSHD; Moradi v SSHD; TDZ v SSHD; Wiles v SSHD – Acting pro bono (through the AIRE Centre) in multiple successful appeals by EEA nationals against Deportation Orders.

He has also recently been acting with David Lock QC in two significant healthcare cases:

• Advising an NHS Trust in respect of issues arising following the first instance judgment in R (Bayer Plc and Novartis) v NHS Darlington Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG) & Ors [2018] EWHC 2465 (Admin);

• Advising a care home provider concerning a proposed judicial review of a local authority purporting to exercise a regulatory function reserved to the Care Quality Commission.

He has considerable expertise in planning and environmental law (see separate tabs), and regularly advises on cases that combine public and property law.

Matthew regularly acts for claimants in judicial review claims challenging detention and deportation, and he also acts for appellants in the First-Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) and in the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber).

He regularly acts pro bono, in particular for the AIRE Centre and the National Deaf Children’s Society.

Prior to joining Landmark Chambers, Matthew was a Legal Assistant at the European Council of Refugees and Exiles in Brussels, Belgium. He has also volunteered for a number of legal charities in London, including the Free Representation Unit, the Afghan and Central Asia Association, the National Centre for Domestic Violence, the Bar Pro Bono Unit, Southwark Law Centre and the Refugee Children’s Rights Project.

Property

Matthew has a property practice with particular expertise in cases that require knowledge of planning, environmental and public law. Recent work includes:

• Acting for a high-profile UK retailer in injunction proceedings against trespassers across a number of different sites.

• Acting for a major gas transporter in a successful urgent application in the High Court for an interim injunction preventing development works in the vicinity of a high-pressure pipeline.

• Successfully representing a group of Right-to-Buy leaseholders in resisting a £50,000 service charge demand per flat in the First-Tier Tribunal: see News Item.

• An arbitration, led by Katharine Holland QC, over the interpretation of compensation clauses in a pipeline easement deed.

Cases

• Kaitey v SSHD [2021] EWCA Civ 1875 – whether conditional immigration bail can be imposed on a person if it would be unlawful to detain them;

• Patel v SSHCLG [2021] EWHC 2115 (Admin) – Interpretation of a planning condition concerning noise impacts;

• Hedges v SSHCLG [2021] EWHC 2392 (Admin) – Challenge under section 289 to an Inspector’s decision to dismiss an appeal against an enforcement notice;

• R (Balhav Singh) v SSHD (JR/5767/2019) – Acted for the Secretary of State in a case about the duty to remedy an historical injustice in immigration decisions;

• R (Tumani) v Transport for London (CO/2610/2020) – Acted for claimant in a challenge to a decision to re-route a bus;

• Monkhill Ltd v SSHCLG[2021] EWCA Civ 74 – Meaning of policies providing a “clear reason for refusal” in National Planning Policy Framework para. 11(d);

• R (Finch) v Surrey CC [2020] EWHC 3566 (Admin) – Scope of requirement to carry out environmental impact assessment in relation to greenhouse gas emissions (appeal to Court of Appeal pending);

• Peel Investments (North) Ltd v SSHCLG [2021] PTSR 298 – Whether a time-expired plan is “out of date” under para. 11(d) of the National Planning Policy Framework;

• Peel Investments (North) Ltd v SSHCLG  [2020] EWCA Civ 1175

• KT and SH v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2020] UKUT 252 (AAC)

• Keep Bourne End Green v Wycombe Council  [2020] EWHC 1984 (Admin) 

• Aireborough Neighbourhood Development Forum v Leeds City Council  [2020] 1 W.L.R. 2355; [2020] 1461 (Admin); [2020] EWHC 2183 (Admin)

• R (Sarah Finch) v Surrey County Council  (2020/0351) 

• Craven District Council v SSHCLG  (CO/58/2020)  

• Elmbridge District Council v R (Davison)  [2020] 1 P. & C.R. 1 

• R (Asda Stores Limited) v Leeds City Council  [2020] P.T.S.R. 874 

• Rectory Homes v SSHCLG  [2020] EWHC 2098 (Admin) 

• Abbey Properties v East Cambridgeshire District Council  (CO/1007/2020) 

• Advearse v Dorset Council  [2020] EWHC 807 (Admin) 

• Monkhill Ltd v SSHCLG  [2020] J.P.L. 175 

• Tower Hamlets LBC v SSHCLG  [2020] P.T.S.R. 111

• RR v SSWP  [2019] 1 W.L.R. 6430

• Xyan Holdings v SSHCLG  [2019] EWHC 2907 (Admin)

• R (Locke) v Newcastle City Council  (CO/4426/2019) 

• Lin De Pan v SSHD  (CO/3467/2019)

• HJ Banks & Company Ltd v SSHCLG  [2019] P.T.S.R. 668 

• R (Gorst Energy) v East Devon District Council  (CO/4635/2019) 

• Dover DC & China Gateway International Ltd v CPRE Kent  [2018] 1 W.L.R. 108

• William Davis Ltd v Charnwood BC  [2018] J.P.L. 549 

• Eatherley v Camden LBC  [2017] P.T.S.R. 288 

• RJ, GMcL and CS v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v RJ (PIP)  [2017] UKUT 105 (AAC) 

• Basildon Council v Whiting  (HQ18X03326) 

• Dillner v Sheffield City Council  [2016] Env. L.R. 31 

• Antoniades (No.2) & Others v The Administrator of the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia  (1/2015, 4/2015, 5/2015) 

Qualifications

• Balliol College, University of Oxford (BA, Philosophy, Politics and Economics)
• Birkbeck, University of London (Distinction, LLM Qualifying Law Degree)
• City University London (Outstanding, BPTC)

Scholarships and Awards

• Inner Temple Major Scholarship
• The William Rose Memorial Prize for Excellence in Drafting (for the highest mark in the BPTC drafting assessment)
• The Sibel Dedezade Pro Bono Award (for exceptional pro bono work)
• Winner of the Human Rights Lawyers’ Association Judicial Review Competition 2013
• Winner of the Access to Justice Foundation Student Essay Competition 2013
• Highest ranked UK team, International Monroe E. Price Media Law Moot
• Balliol College Markby Exhibitioner

Inquiries

• 18/01/2022
  Skippy Industries environmental permit revocation appeal (for the Environment Agency)
• 06/01/2022
  Knipton and Eshton Beck water abstraction licence appeals (for the Environment Agency)
• 07/12/2021
  Land West of Loxwood Road, Alfold
• 26/10/2021
  Land at Cornwall Road, Basildon
• 12/10/2021
  Site Allocations DPD Examination, Cheshire East
• 14/09/2021
  Old Army Camp, Chichester
• 01/09/2021
  Land East of Broad Road, Hambrook
• 26/07/2021
  Whitstable Oyster Company, Whitstable
• 01/07/2021
  Madonna Halley Hotel, Edgware
• 27/04/2021
  Bullens Green Lane, Colney Heath
• 16/02/2021
  Newbridge Road, Bath
• 01/03/2020
  Oyster Trestles, Whitstable
• 01/02/2020
  Land at the former Redcar Steel Works, Redcar
• 01/01/2020
  Land East of Loxwood Road, Alfold
• 01/01/2020
  Missanda, Wells Lane, Ascot
• 04/06/2019
  Swanley Town Centre Regeneration, Swanley
• 02/04/2019
  Holly House, Harpsden
• 12/03/2019
  Waterside Holiday Park, Essex
• 21/01/2019
  Land South of Gloucester Road, Thornbury
• 04/12/2018
  Former Kumor Nursery, Sandwich
• 20/11/2018
  Whitecap Mushroom Farm, Maldon
• 22/05/2018
  Land East of Park Road, Didcot
• 01/05/2018
  Racton View, Westbourne
• 20/02/2018
  Broadoak, Worsley
• 23/01/2018
  Handforth Dean Retail Park, Cheshire
• 09/01/2018
  South Eden Park Road, Bromley
• 05/09/2017
  324 Philip Lane, Hackney
• 05/07/2017
  Potters Farm, Bromley
• 25/04/2017
  Flatts Lane, Redcar
• 14/03/2017
  Oakfield Farm, Essex
• 01/02/2017
  Gorstyhill ‘Wychwood Village Extension’, Crewe
• 01/11/2016
  Land East of Fontwell Avenue, Fontwell
• 27/09/2016
  Cheshire East Local Plan Examination
• 19/05/2016
  Footpath – Carey Way to Footpath 1 near Clifton Bridge, Olney
• 08/12/2015
  Recovered Part IIA contaminated land appeal opens
• 08/12/2015
  Stonegate Housing Estate, Walsall
• 24/11/2015
  37 The Circle, London

Articles and Presentations

• Planning Case Law in 2021: A re-cap – webinar
• Climate Change: current issues
• Environmental Law Conference 2021 – webinar
• “Manifestly without reasonable foundation” and deference in socio-economic case
• R (SC and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2021] UKSC 26 – webinar
• LPAs resisting written representations appeals
• Planning Law Update for Local Authorities: Dealing with Appeals
• Planning Case Law in 2020: A re-cap – webinar
• SEA and EIA case law: review of the year
• Planning High Court Challenges Annual Conference, Part 1 – webinar
• The objector’s perspective: opposing acquisition
• Delivering Major Infrastructure: Part 2 – Justifying the land acquisition strategy – Webinar
• Planning Shorts – Episode 5: Covid-19 Recovery: What’s in the Business and Planning Bill?
• Planning Shorts – Episode 4: How is Covid 19 affecting HLS and what is the Government’s response?
• Planning Shorts – Episode 3: Just how tilted is the tilted balance?
• Planning Shorts – Episode 2: Is the Planning System ripe for reform?
• Planning Shorts – Episode 1: Is the Planning System Rigged?
• The Environment Bill: Policy Objectives for Biodiversity and Local Nature Recovery Strategies
• Current Issues in Environmental Law Part 4: The Environment Bill, biodiversity net gain and nature conservation – Webinar
• EU Settlement Scheme – Current Issues
• EU free movement law and the EU settlement scheme – Webinar
• The proposed extension of police powers against unauthorised encampments
• Injunctions etc against protesters and travellers – Webinar
• A Comprehensive Guide to the Latest Planning Law, Practice and Policy (Part Two) – Webinar
• The Top Ten Secretary Of State Planning Decisions over the past year
• Habitats Law Update
• Appendix EU – An Overview
• Environmental Law – Case Law Update
• Environmental Impact Assessment
• Litigating In The First Tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) Environment Chamber – Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure (including Costs)
• EEA Deportation: Recent cases
• Cladding and Fire Safety Improvements post-Grenfell
• Deportation and Article 8 ECHR
• Trafficking and immigration status
• Brexit and Immigration: Citizens’ Rights in the Draft Withdrawal Agreement – Implementation
• Damages for Unlawful Immigration Detention: Recent cases
• Collective Enfranchisement: What can be acquired?
• Revised NPPF: Viability
• Schemes Involving Tall Buildings
• Lease extension claims under the 1993 Act: The right to a new lease
• Update on the Personal Independence Payment
• Planning Conditions Post-Trump
• Environmental Damage
• Collective Enfranchisement: The Participants