Planning and Infrastructure
- Planning and Infrastructure
- Property
- Public
- Environment
- Rating and Valuation
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Commercial Dispute Resolution
- Costs
- European Union Law
- Immigration, Civil Liberties and Human Rights
- International
Unbeatable in their fieldLegal 500
-
Meet the team
- Reuben Taylor QC (Joint Head of Chambers)
- Richard Drabble QC
- David Elvin QC
- John Male QC
- Timothy Corner QC
- Russell Harris QC
- Tim Mould QC
- Neil Cameron QC
- Paul Brown QC
- John Litton QC
- Rupert Warren QC
- Sasha White QC
- Christopher Boyle QC
- James Maurici QC
- David Forsdick QC
- Dan Kolinsky QC
- Matthew Reed QC
- Graeme Keen QC
- Robert Walton QC
- Tim Buley QC
- Scott Lyness QC
- David Blundell QC
- Jenny Wigley QC
- Gwion Lewis QC
- Carine Patry QC
- Simon Pickles
- David Smith
- Thomas Jefferies
- Stephen Morgan
- Christopher Jacobs
- James Hanham
- Stephen Whale
- Guy Williams
- David Nicholls
- Alex Goodman
- Richard Moules
- Sasha Blackmore
- Jonathan Wills
- Katrina Yates
- James Neill
- Jacqueline Lean
- Richard Turney
- Zack Simons
- Katie Helmore
- Andrew Parkinson
- Andrew Byass
- Leon Glenister
- Heather Sargent
- Yaaser Vanderman
- Matthew Dale-Harris
- Matthew Fraser
- Luke Wilcox
- Anjoli Foster
- Admas Habteslasie
- Hannah Gibbs
- Matthew Henderson
- Ben Fullbrook
- Tom Morris
- Nicholas Grant
- Katharine Elliot
- Joel Semakula
- Peter Sibley
- Alex Shattock
- Kimberley Ziya
- Georgina Fenton
- Joe Thomas
- Charles Bishop
-
Planning and Infrastructure
- Community Infrastructure Levy
- Compulsory Purchase and Compensation
- Criminal Planning Matters
- Development Contracts and Overage
- Development Plans and other planning policy
- Energy
- Environmental Impact Assessment
- Flooding and Drainage
- Fracking
- Highways, Footpaths and Rights of Way
- Infrastructure
- Landscape, Agriculture and Countryside
- Marine Planning and Harbour Orders
- Neighbourhood Planning
- Parliamentary Bills
- Planning Advice
- Planning Appeals, Inquiries and Hearings
- Planning Enforcement
- Planning Injunctions
- Planning Judicial and Statutory Reviews
- Section 106 Agreements and Enforcement
- Strategic Environmental Assessment
- State Aid and Procurement
- Transport Orders
- Village Greens, Commons and Manorial Rights
- Wildlife and Habitats
- Attorney General’s Panel of Counsel
- Welsh Government's Panel of Counsel
Landmark were awarded the Planning/Environment Set of the Year at the 2021 Chambers Bar Awards. Chambers & Partners consistently ranks Landmark as the top set for planning law, noting “an unrivalled breadth of talent, with the perfect balance of a range of heavyweight silks and a full complement of highly capable juniors.” The Legal 500 also ranks Landmark as the top tier planning set, describing Chambers as “unbeatable in their field [with] the highest concentration of top practitioners in the planning field, with broad experience across the planning piece” as well as noting the team’s “extraordinary strength in depth.” In Planning Magazine’s annual survey of top planning barristers, Landmark QCs and juniors regularly do extremely well – the 2021 Survey featured 18 ranked Landmark silks, 11 ranked Landmark juniors (including first and second place), and seven of the top planning juniors under 35 (including first place).
A team of Landmark barristers led by Christopher Lockhart-Mummery QC and David Elvin QC edits the Encyclopaedia of Planning Law and Practice.
Landmark barristers appear at many of the biggest inquiries every year, and advise on development schemes at all stages. Expertise extends to all aspects of planning and development.
Landmark barristers have regularly been and are continually instructed in major infrastructure inquiries and cases of national importance for example Crossrail, High Speed 2 and Heathrow expansion.
Our barristers are experienced in the various routes to consent, whether through development consent orders under the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects regime under the Planning Act 2008, Transport and Works Act Orders, planning permissions or hybrid Bills.
Members of Chambers appear in planning cases in the Higher Courts. Over the last year that has involved numerous appearances in the Supreme Court (e.g. R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)) v North Yorkshire County Council [2020] UKSC 3, R (Wright) v Resilient Energy v Severndale Ltd [2019] UKSC 53 and London Borough of Lambeth v SSHCLG [2019] UKSC 33), Court of Appeal (e.g. R (Plan B Earth) v Secretary of State for Transport [2020] EWCA Civ 214 and Renew Land Development Ltd v Welsh Ministers [2020] EWCA Civ 143) and the Planning Court. Since the introduction of the NPPF in 2012 Landmark barristers have been involved in many of the leading Higher Court cases on the interpretation of the NPPF.
Our “unrivalled breadth of experience and quality at all levels” (Planning Magazine) means that we are the first port of call for all aspects of planning law in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, no matter how big or small the development.
Moreover, Landmark’s expertise in public law, property law and environmental law makes us uniquely placed to advise on the many planning cases that overlap with these areas.
Click here to download a copy of our Junior Planning Team Brochure.
-
Recent Cases
- R (Swire) v Canterbury City Council [2022] EWHC 390 (Admin)
- Council's refusal to list local sports field as an asset of community value was unlawful, rules High Court
- Minister dismisses Westferry Printworks appeal after Secretary of State agreed to new decision
- Pro Investments Limited v London Borough of Hounslow [2021] UKUT 0201 (LC)
- R(Sahota) v Hereford Council [2021] EWHC 2408