:
Home > Cases > Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil BC
31 / Dec / 2006

Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil BC

Acted for interveners Temple Legal Protection. Solicitors Colemans

Case concerned the acceptability of three stage premiums in ATE insurance. Case with wide implications for the profession.

 
icon-accordion-chevron icon-arrow-left icon-arrow-right icon-chevron-down icon-chevron-left icon-cross icon-download icon-letter icon-linked-in icon-phone-outline icon-phone icon-search icon-search icon-select-chevron icon-top-right-corner icon-twitter

Landmark Chambers has updated its cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media website if you visit a page which contains embedded content from social media. Such third party cookies may track your use of Landmark’s website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Landmark website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time Find out more