R (Trustees of the Cecil Family Trust) v South Kesteven District Council  EWHC 1978 (Admin)
This judicial review concerned a significant point arising under s66 of the Listed Buildings Act 1990. Proposed development would abut a boundary wall and a stone outbuilding, both of which were listed. No thought had been given to how the proposal would be constructed: if the developer wanted to interfere with the fabric of the listed structures he would need a party wall agreement and any alterations to the fabric of the listed structures would need listed building consent. Holgate J decided that, at the time of granting planning permission for the proposal, it was necessary to consider the effect of the proposal on the listed building, given the obligation to have special regard to the desirability of preserving the listed fabric under s66. S66 was not confined to proposals which involved direct interference with the fabric of a listed building (eg applications for listed building consent to carry out alterations or demolition). Presumably this decision means that, at the stage of granting planning permission for the neighbouring development, the decision-maker must know about the likely structural effects on the listed building.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.