Home > Cases > Cadogan v 2 Herbert Crescent Freehold Limited

Lands Tribunal LRA/91/2007

This was an appeal from a decision of the LVT as to the price payable on a collective enfranchisement. It concerns the relatively common recent phenomenon of conversion of flats back into houses in prime areas. Cadogan claimed an additional premium of £600,000 to reflect what it claimed was the potential to convert the existing flats back into a house.

Thomas Jefferies acted for the tenants, who disputed the claim for development value on a number of grounds, including the inability of the freeholder to exercise the redevelopment break clause in an extended lease because of the existence of a headlease.

The case raised interesting questions as to the interpretation of section 61 of the 1993 Act, and how uncertainties as to legal issues should be reflected in the price a purchaser would pay.

icon-accordion-chevron icon-arrow-left icon-arrow-right icon-chevron-down icon-chevron-left icon-cross icon-download icon-letter icon-linked-in icon-phone-outline icon-phone icon-search icon-search icon-select-chevron icon-top-right-corner icon-twitter