Home > Cases > Arun DC v Vanstian Ltd

Guy Williams acted for the ratepayer in successfully resisting the enforcement of demand notices where the Council asserted C’s occupation was not rateable because it was only for the purposes of a tax avoidance scheme, namely to trigger an exemption period from rates.

icon-accordion-chevron icon-arrow-left icon-arrow-right icon-chevron-down icon-chevron-left icon-cross icon-download icon-letter icon-linked-in icon-phone-outline icon-phone icon-search icon-search icon-select-chevron icon-top-right-corner icon-twitter