Prioritisation of NHS resources during Covid-19 pandemic: Administrative Court rejects judicial review challenge

Healthcare web

At a hearing held remotely on 24 February, Swift J refused permission for the Claimants to proceed with a judicial review claim against the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and NHS England, on a topic which has generated much debate and publicity. The Claimants’ case is that there is a mandatory obligation for the Defendants to issue national guidance on how patients should be prioritised for NHS critical care resources if demand for critical care services exceeds supply as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. They argue that a duty to issue such guidance arises under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 and/or Article 8 ECHR, and that the refusal to issue national prioritisation guidance is irrational. Swift J accepted the submissions of the Defendants that all three grounds were unarguable. Julia Smyth represented the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, instructed by the Government Legal Department.

Download your shortlist

Download All Download icon