Richard Drabble QC was called to the Bar in 1975 and took silk in 1995. He practices in public law, planning and other local government matters. He has appeared frequently as an advocate at all levels of domestic courts, particularly the Administrative Court as well as the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords. His practice also has a European dimension, with many appearances (in planning, environmental and social security matters) before the ECJ and the European Court of Human Rights and the former Commission. He has appeared for both developers and local authorities in major planning inquiries. He is a former Chairman of the Administrative Law Bar Association and a member of the Planning and Environment Bar Association.
He is recognised as a leader in the fields of administrative law, planning and local government law. Chambers & Partners Directory 2012 and the Legal 500 2011 said of him:
Instructing solicitors are in awe of Richard Drabble QC's court manner. They say that he offers "excellent, cerebral advocacy and is good at picking apart the opposition's arguments." Clearly well respected by the judiciary, he is a standout lawyer for claimant, housing and social security public law-related cases. This highly experienced practitioner continues to be involved in the most significant cases, appearing over the past year in the constitutionally important case of Cart and acting before the Supreme Court in the case of Pinnock, a matter concerning eviction proceedings."
"Richard Drabble QC is an ‘excellent advocate and highly regarded by the Supreme Court’"
"The well-respected Richard Drabble QC of Landmark Chambers is "lightning quick in his ability to get on top of a case and present it attractively." Many consider him one of the leading barristers in the country."
"Public law specialist Richard Drabble QC is "an extremely accomplished silk who really instils confidence." He regularly appears as an advocate at all levels of domestic courts and has a strong track record in handling environmental, planning and social security matters before the ECJ and ECHR."
"In Richard Drabble QC Landmark Chambers has one of the Bar's stellar names for public law, planning and local government-related matters. Instructing solicitors trust him implicitly and "rely on his judgement as to how courts will and won't react."
"In common with Lockhart-Mummery, the "very persuasive" Richard Drabble QC is deemed to be "a gentleman advocate," and is much sought after for his ability to lead the most difficult cases. His experience covers all the domestic courts, and he has further made numerous appearances before the ECJ and ECHR."
"Richard Drabble QC is "one of the best barristers at the Social Housing Bar" and is noted for the importance of the cases he leads."
Richard Drabble has acted for a wide range of clients, examples being the Secretary of State in challenges to the Terminal Five planning permission, the Airports and Energy White Papers; and the Olympics CPO; Natural England in the Thames Basin Heath SPA litigation; Associated British Ports in connection with a proposed Harbour Revision Order at Immingham; Amnesty International in the Pinochet medical reports case; the developer in R(Lewis) v Redcar BC and Persimmon and in R(Kides) v South Cambridgeshire DC; JCWI and the AIRE Centre in the litigation concerning alleged marriages of convenience; Quinn Glass in the Court of Appeal hearing about an IPCC permit; 3C Limited in a Commercial Court case about the Landfill Directive; and Mrs Stec; Ms Tsfayo; Mrs Chapman and Mrs Kehoe in their various cases in the European Court of Human Rights. He appeared for the local authorities in the Dibden Bay Inquiry.
Richard Drabble read History at Downing College, Cambridge.He has lectured frequently on public law matters, particularly recently on human rights issues in planning. Richard is currently Vice-Chair of the Bar Council Law Reform Committee.
21 Jun 2011
Key constitutional case concerning whether the Upper Tribunal is amenable to judicial review in cases where no statutory appeal is available, as was the case with the previous tribunals that the Upper Tribunal replaced.
16 Mar 2011
Supreme Court ruling on the compatibility with EU law of the imposition of a ‘right to reside’ test for social security benefits within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) 1408/71
29 Jul 2010
The appellant (Garner) was appealing against a decision of Nicol J refusing him a PCO. It was common ground that the case was one to which Directive 85/337 (as amended by Directive 2003/35) applied which, in effect, transposes the principles of the Aarhus Convention into EU law.
18 Mar 2009
Richard Drabble QC appears in a case challenging a school employee’s right to legal representation
11 Dec 2008
A case concerning important guidance as to what constitutes an “interest” within regulation 4 (2) (e) of the (now revoked) Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000
22 Oct 2008
A case with wide implications for social security rights, homelessness and discrimination under the Convention
30 Jul 2008
A case concerning the calculation of the maximum allowable housing benefit for a person who is eligible for support
29 Jul 2008
House of Lords case concerning the compatibility with Article 12 ECHR of the legislative and policy scheme set up to restrict non-EU/EEA immigrants’ ability to marry in the UK
01 Jul 2008
01 May 2008
01 Nov 2007
12 Jul 2007
24 Jun 2007
01 Jan 2007
01 Jan 2007
01 Jan 2007
01 Jan 2007
01 Jan 2007
01 Jan 2007
01 Jan 2007
01 Jan 2007
01 Jan 2007
31 Dec 2006
15 Nov 2006
14 Nov 2006
Richard Drabble QC acts in a judgment with wide implications for administrative decision making
18 Jul 2006
11 Nov 2005
27 Oct 2005
06 Sep 2005
Richard Drabble QC acts in a case concerning social security benefits
01 Mar 2005
01 Jul 2004
09 May 2002
01 Jan 2002
01 Jan 2001
01 Jan 2001
01 Jan 2001
01 Jan 2000
01 Jan 1999
01 Jan 1995
29 Jun 2007
19 Jun 2007
29 Jul 2005
There are no publications available.
Landmark Chambers | Sitemap | Disclaimer | Site by Treat Digital Ltd
© Landmark Chambers 2012
