Home > Cases > R (on the application of Reilly and another) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] UKSC 68

The Supreme Court has handed down judgment in the case concerning the Government’s ‘back to work schemes’.

The Court unanimously upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal that the regulations introducing several such schemes had been ultra vires the Jobseeker’s Act. Had it not been for rectifying legislation enacted after the Court of Appeal’s judgment the schemes would have been quashed. It also held that valid notice had not been provided under the regulations to the appellants and, going further than the Court of Appeal, that additional information about the back to work schemes had to be provided to every person who was required to participate in such a scheme. The Supreme Court also held that the schemes did not constitute compulsory labour and therefore do not engage Article 4.

Nathalie Lieven QC successfully represented Ms Reilly and Mr Wilson.

Click here and here to read more.

icon-accordion-chevron icon-arrow-left icon-arrow-right icon-chevron-down icon-chevron-left icon-cross icon-download icon-letter icon-linked-in icon-phone-outline icon-phone icon-search icon-search icon-select-chevron icon-top-right-corner icon-twitter