In Flett v. Matheson, the key issue was whether an employee training under the government’s Modern Apprentice scheme was an “apprentice” for the purposes of employment law. Paul Brown QC appeared as amicus curiae when the case was heard by the EAT. His arguments were unsuccessful before the EAT, but have recently been endorsed by the CA, which allowed Mr Flett’s appeal

icon-accordion-chevron icon-arrow-left icon-arrow-right icon-chevron-down icon-chevron-left icon-cross icon-download icon-letter icon-linked-in icon-phone-outline icon-phone icon-search icon-search icon-select-chevron icon-top-right-corner icon-twitter