Joel joined Chambers in 2020 following completion of pupillage during which he was supervised by Richard Turney, David Nicholls, Galina Ward, Simon Allison and Justin Bates. He accepts instructions in all areas of Chambers’ work.
Prior to starting pupillage, Joel worked in the global litigation team of an oil major between 2018 and 2019. During that time, he advised on various matters including enforcement proceedings, bilateral investment treaty claims, environmental and decommissioning claims, JV disputes and general commercial disputes in various upstream and downstream oil and gas sectors. He also gained experience in institutional arbitration under the LCIA, ICC and LMAA rules.
Following his legal studies, Joel was the Judicial Assistant to Lady Justice Gloster (as she then was) and Lord Justice David Richards at the Court of Appeal from 2017 to 2018 where he assisted on cases covering commercial, chancery, public and international law. He also prepared research for lectures on a range of legal topics including international arbitration, which was a key interest of Gloster LJ.
Before commencing legal studies, Joel was an investment banker with Morgan Stanley in New York. He worked on a range of deals including M&A, leveraged buyouts, equity and debt offerings and recapitalisations for healthcare companies. Joel, therefore, brings a wealth of commercial experience to his practice at the Bar.
Away from the law, Joel can be found performing on a comedy stage or volunteering with initiatives that support social mobility.
Joel was the designated Property pupil, having developed his property law experience at the Court of Appeal. His recent instructions include for example:
- Successfully acting for a landlord in the County Court in a claim for rent arrears and property damage and defending a counterclaim for breach of the Housing Act 2004 and breach of covenants.
- Providing advice and drafting on matters such as equality act defences to possession claims, restrictive covenants and the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016.
As a pupil, he gained experience of a wide range of property law issues including:
- Advising landlords and tenants on a range of matters related to possession of residential and commercial premises.
- Advising on rights of way, trespass, 1954 Act renewals, removal and replacement of trustees of land, charging orders, beneficial interests in land, proprietary estoppel, the right to park, interpretation of leases, implication of terms into leases and enforcement of landlord covenants.
- Assisting with hearings, trials and appeals such as the Court of Appeal hearings in Fearn v Tate Gallery Board of Trustees concerning the application of private nuisance to overlooking and subsequent invasion of privacy concerns and Aviva v Williams concerning the proper construction of service charge provisions in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- Drafting pleadings and pre-action letters in a variety of disputes concerning forfeiture, rights of way, the validity of equitable charges and boundary disputes.
As a judicial assistant at the Court of Appeal, Joel worked on:
- Gibbs v Lakeside Developments Ltd  EWCA Civ 2874 which considered whether in circumstances where a possession order is liable to be set aside for non-service of proceedings, a failure to obtain an order setting it aside is fatal to a claim for restitution of the proceeds of sale of the property.
- Stoffel & Co v Grondona  EWCA Civ 2031 concerning whether a client is able to claim damages for the inadequate performance of professional services by a solicitor even where the client’s claim arises from a mortgage fraud.
Commercial / Arbitration
Joel hopes to develop a varied commercial/arbitration practice, having come to the Bar with significant commercial experience, including investment banking, in-house litigation within a major corporation and assisting leading commercial judges.
As a pupil, he gained experience of a wide range of commercial law cases including:
- Advising on issues such as breach of contract where the breach concerned carrying out works to a listed building without listed building consent and in breach of the management agreement, insolvency, charging orders, misrepresentation, penalty clauses, breach of trust, freezing orders and valuation and specific performance.
As an in-house litigator, Joel worked on several multi-million-dollar arbitrations, including:
- An LMAA arbitration concerning the cause of two explosions aboard a large commercial ship that caused the ship to be taken off hire and contaminated the cargo aboard.
- Two related ICC arbitrations concerning indemnification under the French abrupt termination regime for losses/damages incurred following the decision to discontinue shipments of crude oil via a pipeline.
- An ICC arbitration concerning the French interdependence regime and unlawful termination of a European Gas Transportation Agreement.
As a judicial assistant at the Court of Appeal, he worked on:
- Ukraine v Law Debenture Trust Corp Plc  EWCA Civ 2026 (judgement in Supreme Court pending) concerning a claim by the Russian Federation against Ukraine for the non-payment of $3 billion which Ukraine had borrowed under Eurobonds and dealt with issues such as capacity and authority, duress, implied terms, the foreign act of state doctrine and international law more broadly.
- JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov  EWCA Civ 1176 on the proper determination of applications under s.423 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
- Astor Management AG (formerly MRI Holdings AG) v Atalaya Mining Plc (formerly Emed Mining Public Ltd)  EWCA Civ 2407 on the proper interpretation of an obligation to pay deferred consideration under an agreement to purchase an interest in a mine.
- Computer Associates UK Ltd v Software Incubator Ltd  EWCA Civ 518 which considered the important question as to whether a licence to use software supplied electronically and not on any tangible medium amounts to the “sale of goods” under the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 reg.2(1).
- Hutchison 3G UK Limited v The Office of Communications & Others in which the Court of Appeal refused permission to Hutchison 3G to appeal against the judgment of Green J, which dismissed its claim for judicial review of Ofcom’s decision on the auction of 2.3 GHz and 3.4 GHz spectrum.
Joel is developing a varied practice covering all aspects of planning, infrastructure and procurement law.
As a pupil, he gained experience of and assisted with a wide range of planning matters, including:
- Written advice on planning issues, such as inappropriate development in the green belt and AONB, listed building consent, conservation areas, habitats concerns, certiﬁcates of lawful use and proposed development, permitted development rights, compulsory purchase, EIA development, the CIL Regulations, s.106 obligations, five year housing land supply and costs in planning inquiries.
- Preparing pleadings and skeleton arguments in s.284 challenges concerned with the proper interpretation of development plans.
- Court hearings on planning matters including Finney v Welsh Ministers in the Court of Appeal concerning whether s.73 of the TCPA 1990 may be used to vary the terms of the operative part of a planning permission and various judicial review hearings including the Guildford Local Plan challenge and the Heathrow Airport expansion challenges in the Court of Appeal.
- Planning inquiries such as the Clay Cross public inquiry, an inquiry into change of use of a plot from employment to residential for a 80+ housing development in Chesterfield and enforcement inquiries such as the Mercury House public inquiry which considered whether building unlawful operational development had the effect of extinguishing crystallised permitted development rights.
- DCO examinations such as the public examination into Esso’s Southampton to London jet fuel pipeline.
Joel is developing a varied practice covering all aspects of environmental law and has already started taking on his own environmental cases. He was instructed (as a junior to Alex Goodman) to advise on a potential claim in respect of a number of Experimental Traffic Orders made by a local council where carrying out the orders would lead to further breaches of NO2 legal limits and further exacerbate air quality concerns in the area.
As a pupil, he gained experience of environmental law issues including:
- Drafting an advice on the need for further environmental impact assessments following an application to vary an existing planning permission.
- Drafting an advice in respect of a multi-party negligence claim against the Environment Agency on the scope of its duty of care when responding as a statutory consultee.
- Assisting with court hearings on environmental matters such as whether the Paris Agreement was a relevant consideration for the Heathrow Airport National Policy Statement as considered by the Court of Appeal in Plan B v Heathrow Expansion.
As an in-house litigator at an oil major, Joel advised on environmental and decommissioning claims.
Joel is developing a varied public law practice. Examples of his recent instructions, as both sole and junior counsel, include:
- Acting for the Good Law Project and students who have been downgraded from the Centre Assessment Grade (led by Fiona Scolding QC with Leon Glenister and Yaaser Vanderman) to challenge the fairness of Ofqual’s system for awarding A level grades.
- Acting for UsforThem (led by James Maurici QC with Yaaser Vanderman) to challenge government guidance to schools around dealing with COVID outbreaks.
- Appearing in the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chambers) in bail hearings for immigration detainees.
- Drafting on matters related to immigration appeals.
As a pupil, he gained experience of a wide range of public law cases including:
- Advising on issues such as the investigative obligation under Article 2 of Schedule 1 of the HRA 1998, Article 10 of the ECHR, just satisfaction under the ECHR, deprivation of liberty orders, habeas corpus, legitimate expectations, police pensions and immigration appeals including those concerning foreign national offenders.
- Assisting with the preparation of hearings such as Court of Protection proceedings, judicial review proceedings concerning unlawful detention and planning matters and appeals against decisions of the Disclosure and Barring Service (“DBS”).
- Drafting pleadings, skeleton arguments, position statements and urgent applications dealing with issues such as capacity, disability discrimination, DBS barring, legal aid eligibility and ECHR interim measures.
As a judicial assistant at the Court of Appeal, Joel worked on:
- (Uber London Ltd) v Transport for London  EWCA Civ 1213 which considered the proportionality of the voice contact requirement imposed on the operators of London private hire vehicles under the Private Hire Vehicles (London) (Operators’ Licences) Regulations 2000 reg.9(11).
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill – BA Political Science and Economics (First Class)
University of Oxford (Mansfield College) – BA Jurisprudence (with Senior Status)
BPP University, London – BPTC (Outstanding)
University of Oxford: D’Souza Prize for the highest mark on the Senior Status course
Gray’s Inn: The Bedingfield Scholarship, the Inn’s most prestigious award for the BPTC
Gray’s Inn: David Karmel Entrance Award, the Inn’s highest award for the GDL
Freshfields Stephen Lawrence Scholarship
Morehead-Cain Scholarship, full merit scholarship to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Administrative Law Bar Association
Chancery Bar Association
Court of Protection Bar Association
Property Bar Association