Romal Capital (Co2) Ltd v Peel L&P (Ports) Ltd…

A claim concerning ‘loss of chance’ damages in which Mr Justice Fancourt concluded that there was a 60% chance that the claimant would have obtained planning permission for a 640-unit scheme development if the defendant had properly performed its obligations in relation to the integration of the claimant’s designs with its own development proposals.

Katharine Holland KC appeared on behalf of the Defendant, with David Forsdick KC and Katrina Yates.

Click here to view the judgment