What the Directories say
2002/03
“Team player” “Extremely able but wears it lightly” (C&P planning)
2003/04
“rapidly growing profile” (C&P local government); “
“unbelievably mature intellect as well as possessing the common touch” (C&P planning)
2005
“Accomplished and pleasant to work with” “known for his High Court challenges” (C&P planning)
“extremely helpful and bright” “building a varied public law practice” (C&P public law),
“absolutely superb” “ability to handle highly complex and technical cases coupled with a pleasant, capable manner” “favourite with solicitors” (C&P local government)
2006
“truly excellent” “brilliant advocate” (C&P public law)
“a delight to work with”, “clients appreciate his accomplished manner in the courtroom” (C&P planning)
“high flyer”; “good with clients and does not miss a trick” (C&P local government)
2007
“an excellent advocate” “really a pleasure to work with” (C&P public law)
“wildly intelligent” “high flyer” (C&P local government)
“incredibly thorough and astute” “juggles inquiry and court appearances” (C&P planning)
2008
“practice involves acting for all sides in judicial review proceedings” (C&P public law)
“an incredible intellect and judgement to match” “without a doubt, the man you want if you have a tricky case” (C&P local government)
“a sharp and switched on team player who is incredibly reliable” (C&P planning)
2009
admired for “never giving up and working incredibly hard to find the killer point in any case.” A talented advocate, he is respected for his “formidable intellect and nice manner in court.” (C&P public)
“A veritable star of the local government scene “a good example of this set’s talented juniors”. His practice focuses on planning but he also advises on a range of other matters including local government reorganisation, finance and vires, rating and social security (C&P local government)
“thorough and responsive” “highly regarded for his public law expertise” (C&P planning).
2010
“combines tenacity and a winning mentality with a pleasant manner, and his areas of expertise include planning and local government”. (C&P public)
“Although the set is primarily recognised for its dominance in planning it has a number of extremely able barristers who take on a variety of local government work. The "very thorough" Daniel Kolinsky is one such name”; “ He is highly sought after “ (C&P Local Government)
"incredibly bright and thorough with a great sense of humour - he's doing very strong work at the set." (C&P planning)
Ranked in Legal 500 for administrative law, planning and environment – described as “bright and articulate advocate and draftsman”
2011
“The "clever and meticulous" Dan Kolinsky has a busy public law practice alongside his mainstream planning and environment practice” (C&P public).
“extremely bright and a joy to work with” ”commended for his work on rating, planning inquiries and planning and environmental judicial reviews. (C&P local government)
Known for “rolling his sleeves up and getting on with it" (C&P planning)
Ranked in Legal 500 for administrative law, planning and environment, comments: “quite frankly is excellent. It is the lack of airs and graces, and the fact that he is so down to earth that makes him a pleasure to work with”.
Dan graduated from Wadham College, Oxford with a first class degree in jurisprudence.
Before coming to the Bar, he taught contract law at Queen Mary and Westfield College and Mansfield College, Oxford and completed 2-year training contract at Anthony Gold Solicitors. He has also been a Judicial Assistant to the Court of Appeal.
He has written and given lectures on a range of topics in the fields of public law, local government, planning, environmental and special educational needs. He is a governor of Forest Gate Community School.
24 Jun 2009
Court of Appeal upholds the quashing of Planning Inspector’s decision on grounds of apparent bias
18 Feb 2009
Dan Kolisky represents the Secretary of State in a challenge to a Tree Preservation Order
18 Nov 2008
Planning Inspector’s decision quashed for apparent bias
12 Nov 2008
High Court quashes planning permission for Mansfield Bus Station
30 Jul 2008
Case concerning the treatment of Mormon Church buildings for the purposes of non-domestic rating
01 Jan 2007
01 Jan 2007
24 Jan 2006
18 Nov 2005
03 Nov 2005
12 May 2008
01 Jan 2008
01 Jan 2008
01 Jan 2008
01 Jan 2008
02 Dec 2007
19 Jun 2007
13 Mar 2007
01 Jan 2006
01 Jan 2006
01 Jan 2006
01 Jan 2000
19 Jan 2012
09 Dec 2010
01 Jan 2009
Landmark Chambers | Sitemap | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Site by Treat Digital Ltd
© Landmark Chambers 2012
