In this section you will find examples of cases and public inquiries that we have been instructed on. The range of our work is extremely broad in all of our areas and you can use the search engine above to help you. If you cannot find the type of case or the type of inquiry you are looking for then please contact the clerks who will be able to point you in the right direction.
Case Name and Description   |
Date |
![Good Harvest V Centaur [2010] EWHC 330](http://www.landmarkchambers.co.uk/__data/assets/image/0011/7688/page_white_stack.png) |
Good Harvest V Centaur [2010] EWHC 330 >> |
24 Feb 2010 |
|
Satnam Urban Regeneration v Rotherham MBC >> |
04 Dec 2009 |
|
Gateshead CPO >> |
03 Dec 2009 |
|
Knight v. Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2009] EWHC (Admin) >> Case considering (i) the relationship between policy in PPG2 protecting the Green Belt and policy in PPS3 promoting the reuse of previously developed land, and (ii) the compatibility with Article 8 ECHR of the requirement in PPG2 that new dwellings in the Green Belt can only be justified by ‘very special circumstances’. |
03 Dec 2009 |
|
Court of Appeal allows appeal by Boundary Committee in consultation case over unitary local government in Suffolk >> |
02 Dec 2009 |
|
Abbey Investments Ltd v London Development Agency >> |
02 Dec 2009 |
|
R(Cart) v. Upper Tribunal; R (U and XC) v. Special Immigration Appeals Commission [2010] 1 All E. R. 908 >> Milestone judgment concerning the inability of Parliament to exclude the court’s judicial review jurisdiction, and the amenability of SIAC and the Upper Tribunal to judicial review in cases where no statutory appeal is available. |
01 Dec 2009 |
|
Novitskaya v London Borough of Brent (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1260 >> |
01 Dec 2009 |
|
West Lancashire Borough Council v. Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2009] EWHC 3631 (Admin) >> Important case concerning the interpretation of the requirement in PPG2 para. 3.12 for a material change of use of Green Belt land to “maintain the openness of the Green Belt". |
26 Nov 2009 |
|
BHATTI v BHATTI Ch D >> |
26 Nov 2009 |
|
R (on the application of Hayes) v. Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government >> |
06 Nov 2009 |
|
R (Princely) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 3095 (Admin) >> Judicial review concerning the approach to be taken to fresh asylum claims by Tamils who have fought for the LTTE but who have so far escaped the attention of the Sri Lankan authorities, following the European Court of Human Rights’ judgment in NA v. United Kingdom [2008] 48 E.H.R.R. 15. |
05 Nov 2009 |
|
R (Health & Safety Executive) v Wolverhampton City Council and Victoria Hall Limited [2009] EWHC 2688 (Admin) >> |
05 Nov 2009 |
|
HSBC v Collelldevall [2009] EWHC 2954 (ch) >> |
01 Nov 2009 |
08 Mar 2010 Planning permission granted for in-vessel composting facility in Green Belt at Wisley >
03 Mar 2010 High Court to hear argument on the meaning of “resident” for the purposes of s117 of the Mental Health Act 1983 >
02 Mar 2010 Planning permission granted for major integrated waste facility in Essex >
tel
020 7430 1221
e-mail
clerks@landmarkchambers.co.uk
Print
Email
